| Методы и результаты управления сельским хозяйством в хрущёвский период – опыт реконструкции повседневности (50–60-е гг. XX в., на материалах Западной Сибири) | |
| Федорова Марина Ивановна 1, Манченко Константин Александрович 2 | |
| 1.1Московский государственный университет технологий и управления им. К. Г. Разумовского (Первый казачий университет) | |
| Дата поступления 2021.09.23 | Аннотация. Анализируются методы преобразований в аграрном сибирском регионе в период обновления командно-административной системы на демократических началах. Рассматриваются взаимосвязанные противоречивые процессы: декларация демократических принципов руководства и их практическое воплощение через принятие волюнтаристских проектов и решений. Проводится анализ архивных источников, связанных с этим периодом, который позволяет констатировать как положительные результаты управленческой деятельности, так и несбыточность многих начинаний. Сами труженики деревни оказались восприимчивыми к переменам; умели приспосабливаться к изменяющимся условиям, корректировали волевые решения в рамках обыденной практики. |
| Ключевые слова отечественная история, волюнтаристские решения и проекты, методы управления сельским хозяйством, демократизация хозяйственных преобразований, идеологические и хозяйственные установки преобразований в деревне, корректировка волевых решений | |
Библиография 1. Советская историография. – М. : Рос. гос. гуманитар. ун-т, 1996. – 592 с. 2. Андреенков С. Н. Колхозно-совхозная система СССР в 1946–1964 гг. в современной отечественной историографии // Вестник Томского государственного университета. История. – 2019. – № 58. – С. 5–11. – DOI: 10.17223/19988613/58/1. 3. Ильиных В. А. Аграрный строй Сибири в XX в.: этапы трансформации // Ежегодник по аграрной истории Восточной Европы. 2012: Типология и особенности аграрного развития России и Восточной Европы Х–ХХI вв. / отв. Е. Н. Швейковская. – М. ; Брянск : РИО Брян. ун-та, 2012. – № 1. – С. 620–630. 4. Смирнов С. А. Антропологический поворот: его смысл и уроки // Философия и культура. – 2017. – № 2. – С. 23–35. 5. Исторический опыт и перестройка. Человеческий фактор в социально-экономическом развитии / под ред. В. А. Козлова. – М. : Мысль, 1989. – 302 с. 6. Страницы истории советского общества: Факты, проблемы, люди / под. ред. А. Т. Кинкулькина. – М. : Политиздат, 1989. – 447 с. 7. Яковлев А. Сумерки. – М. : Материк, 2003. – 687 с. 8. Кондрашин В. В. История села Лох // Крестьяноведение. Теория, история, современность. Ежегодник. 1997 / под ред. В. Данилова, Т. Шанина. – М., 1997. – С. 176–216. 9. Манякин С. И. Сибирь далёкая и близкая. – М. : Фонд им. И. Д. Сытина. – 2003. – 447 с. 10. Шумилов М. И. История России: конец XIX – начало XXI века. – 2-е изд., испр. и доп. – Ростов н/Д. : Феникс, 2005. – 637 с. 11. Федорова М. И. История преодоления волюнтаризма хрущёвской эпохи в сельском хозяйстве (на материалах Западной Сибири) // Омский научный вестник. Серия «Общество. История. Современность». – 2013. – № 4 (121). – С. 21–24. 12. Чернышев Б. В. Вольные интерпретации фактов в решениях Н. С. Хрущёва // Информационная безопасность регионов. – 2009. – № 2 (5). – С. 96–103. 13. История Сибири с древнейших времён до наших дней : в 5 т. / под. ред. А. П. Окладникова. – Л. : Наука, 1969. – Т. 5 : Сибирь в период завершения строительства социализма и перехода к коммунизму. – 465 с. 14. Крестьянство и сельское хозяйство Сибири в 1917–1961 гг. / под ред. В. С. Флерова. – Новосибирск : Наука, Сиб. отд-ние, 1965. – 158 с. | |
Сведения о финансировании и благодарности | |
| Methods and Results of Agricultural Management in the Khrushchev Period – the Experience of Reconstructing Everyday Life (50-60s of the 20th Century, Based on Materials from Western Siberia) | |
| Fedorova Marina I.1, Manchenko Konstantin A.2 | |
| 1.1K.G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies and Management (First Cossack University) | |
| Received 2021.09.23 | Abstract. The purpose of the study is to analyze the methods and results of transformations in the agrarian sector of the West Siberian region during the period of renewal of the command-аdministrative system on a democratic basis during the reign of N.S. Khrushchev. The task is to identify the ideological and economic attitudes and decisions of the central and local government bodies in the period of the 50-60s of the 20th century in agriculture. As well as the results of large-scale transformations through the prism of everyday life unfolding through the labor activity of the peasantry and the leadership. The interrelated contradictory processes are considered: the declaration of democratic principles of leadership and their practical implementation in the context of the adoption of large-scale voluntaristic projects and decisions. The analysis of archival sources associated with this period is carried out, which allows us to state both the positive results of management activities and the unrealizability of many undertakings. It also concludes that the village workers themselves were more susceptible to change than the leadership. Soviet historiography of post-Stalinist modernization focused on the phenomenon of transformations, party leadership, and the negative results of the changes that took place. At the turn of the 80-90s of the 20th century there was a turn in the historiographic process, primary attention was paid to the human factor, the everyday life of the historical process. The authors localized their attention to studying the content of the interaction between theory and practice, will and objective conditions, the influence on the course of events in the agricultural sector of an ordinary worker in the collective and state farm period. On the basis of archival sources, periodicals, memoirs and historiographic analysis, an assessment of the methods of state and economic management of agriculture as humanistic, including, is given, while the inconsistency of the methods is not questioned. The importance of this approach is associated with the need to comprehend modernization processes not only as reforms "from above", but also as the need for the participation of the population itself in these processes. Another thing is that this participation had a corrective influence: both visible: positive and negative, which became the subject of this work, and hidden, which may be the topic of the next article. The contradictory nature of the Khrushchev era (the interweaving of democratic and conservative traditions in the management system) did not exclude the interest of the direct workers of the village in a motivated contribution, both collective and personal, to the development of agriculture at the local level when solving socially significant problems of village life. The voluntaristic decisions favorably perceived by the population could not be objectively resolved in full; they were lowered to the local level, subjectively corrected by those who directly implemented them: the workers themselves and regional managers. |
| Keywords national history, voluntaristic solutions and projects, methods of agricultural management, democratization of economic transformations, ideological and economic principles of transformations in the countryside, correction of volitional decisions | |
References 1. Sovetskaya istoriografiya [Soviet historiography], Moscow, Russian State University for Humanities Publ., 1996, 592 p. (in Russian). 2. Andreenkov S.N. The USSR collective farm and state farm system of 1946-1964 in the modern national historiography. Tomsk State University Journal of History, 2019, no. 58, pp. 5-11. DOI: 10.17223/19988613 /58/1. (in Russian). 3. Il’inykh V.A. Agrarnyi stroi Sibiri v XX v.: etapy transformatsii [The agrarian system of Siberia in the 20th century: stages of transformation]. Shveikovskaya E.N. (ed.). Ezegodnik po agrarnoi istorii Vostochnoi Evropy. 2012: Tipologiya i osobennosti agrarnogo razvitiya Rossii i Vostochnoi Evropy X–XXI vv. [Yearbook on the agrarian history of Eastern Europe. 2012: Typology and features of the agrarian development of Russia and Eastern Europe in the 10th – 11th centuries], Moscow, Bryansk, Bryansk University Publ., 2012, no. 1, pp. 620-630. (in Russian). 4. Smirnov S.A. Antropologicheskii povorot: ego smysl i uroki [Anthropological turn: its meaning and lessons]. Filosofiya i kul’tura [Philosophy and Culture], 2017, no. 2, pp. 23-35. (in Russian). 5. Kozlov V.A. (ed.). Istoricheskii opyt i perestroika. Chelovecheskii faktor v sotsial’no-ekonomicheskom razvitii [Historical experience and restructuring. The human factor in socio-economic development], Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1989, 302 p. (in Russian). 6. Kinkul’kin A.T. (ed.). Stranitsy istorii sovetskogo obshchestva: Fakty, problemy, lyudi [Pages of the history of Soviet society: Facts, problems, people], Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1989, 447 p. (in Russian). 7. Yakovlev A. Sumerki [Twilight], Moscow, Materik Publ., 2003, 687 p. (in Russian). 8. Kondrashin V.V. Istoriya sela Lokh [History of the village of Lokh]. Danilov V., Shanin T. (eds.). Krest’yanovedenie. Teoriya, istoriya, sovremennost’. Ezhegodnik. 1997 [Peasant studies. Theory, history, modernity. Yearbook. 1997], Moscow, 1997, pp. 176-216. (in Russian). 9. Manyakin S.I. Sibir’ dalekaya i blizkaya [Siberia, distant and close], Moscow, I.D. Sytin’s Fund Publ., 2003, 447 p. (in Russian). 10. Shumilov M.I. Istoriya Rossii: konets XIX – nachalo XXI veka [History of Russia: late 19th – early 21st century], 2nd ed., Rostov on Don, Feniks Publ., 2005, 637 p. (in Russian). 11. Fedorova M.I. Overcoming of Khrushchev’s epoch of voluntarism in agriculture (by the material of Western Siberia). Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series “Society. History. Modernity”, 2013, no. 4 (121), pp. 21-24. (in Russian). 12. Chernyshev B.V. Free interpretations of the facts in N.S. Khrushchev’s decisions. Information security of the regions, 2009, no. 2 (5), pp. 96-103. (in Russian). 13. Okladnikov A.P. (ed.). Istoriya Sibiri s drevneishikh vremen do nashikh dnei [History of Siberia from ancient times to the present day], in 5 volumes, Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1969, Vol. 5: Sibir’ v period zaversheniya stroitel’stva sotsializma i perekhoda k kommunizmu [Siberia in the period of completion of the construction of socialism and the transition to communism], 465 p. (in Russian). 14. Flerov V.S. (ed.). Krest’yanstvo i sel’skoe khozyaistvo v Sibiri v 1917–1961 gg. [The peasantry and agriculture of Siberia in 1917-1961], Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1965, 158 p. (in Russian). | |
Acknowledgements | |
| Сведения об авторах Федорова Марина Ивановна 1.1 Манченко Константин Александрович 2.1 |
| About the authors Fedorova Marina I. 1.1 Manchenko Konstantin A. 2.1 |
